PDA

View Full Version : SCUBA Air Compressor?



d.rierson
01-31-2008, 06:06 PM
I’m thinking of buying and using a Scuba air compressor to pump natural gas. Breathing air compressors of the 5 HP size pump 3000 psi at about 3.5 cfm and new are about $3000+. I have tested a 1/3 hp air compressor to pump the 7” WC natural gas from my meter to the propane tank for the B-B-Q to 100 psi. Aren’t propane systems designed to max out about 250 psi? Anyways I won’t be taking propane camping with me anymore now. SO, if I use a 250 gal propane tank as a reservoir, I can give the scuba compressor an increased inlet pressure to facilitate a faster fill. What pressure should I try?
I’m thinking of routing the natural gas through a 1” drier to the Scuba’s compressor’s intake manifold, and bypass the breathing air filters on the output side. Doing this may allow some oil mist in the natural gas that may be just what the Doctor ordered for car engines. Or would it be wiser to convert the high pressure breathing air filters to driers and eliminate the intake drier? OR just use the breathing air filters to filter the natural gas?
How fast might this 1/3 HP + 5 HP system fill a 10 gal car?
For a faster fill, I’ll but some Scuba tanks together in a cascade system with a CNG fill coupling at the end, then add some pressure on/off switches to make it automatic. WHAT DO YOU GUYS AND GALS THINK? Should I try it and let you know what happens? Any advice and recommendations may be the difference between success and failure and or something damaged or not. Whow, I bet someone is doing this already, are you out there? Sincerely D.Rierson

Timon
01-31-2008, 08:58 PM
Bad idea unless your planing to blow your self up.

No way is a SCUBA compressor designed to do CNG.

cngmike
01-31-2008, 09:22 PM
The first thing is the motor and controls. all of the controls and must be intrinsically safe or explosion proof the same with the motor. Your other choice is a remote control panel in other words a panel with all contacts mounted at least 12 feet off the skid (This all falls under NFPA 52) at least here in southern Ca. a home compressor can be no more than 2 cfm. Storage is forbade. If you do make sure you have PRD's on the tanks. Breathing air machines are designed to operate on atmospheric pressure. By upping the inlet pressure you increase the rod load. putting more wear and tear on the bottom end of the machine, cutting the life of the compressor or worse. you will be able to operate at standard presser, 7 inches of water column, but not much more. depending on the outlet filters you can get high pressure dryer cartridges that will also coalesce oil from a man I know locally and there is another manufacture in Florida whose name escapes me.

What is the make of of the breathing air compressor you have and how about some picts. Both Ingersoll Rand and Baure make NG compressor based on breathing air machines.

d.rierson
02-01-2008, 09:27 AM
Thanks for great reply. There is a 5HP Max-air 35 and a Bauer used for sale on Craigslist LA listed under Sporting Goods- compressor, for $2200 each.
The remote control panel would be no problem, then replacing the Gas or Electric motor that comes with the compressor for an explosion proof one is possible but adds cost. What if the motor and control panel was remote from the compressor? Long drive belt would be a problem but could be solved. Can you give supplier for the high pressure dryer cartridges you had in mind? As you said that storage is forbidden and 7” WC is OK for the compressor I would need to adapt a CNG filler coupler to the output side of the high pressure dryer. Where would I buy one new or used, any ideas?
I appreciate your positive feed back and knowledge in this mater.
Sincerely D.rierson

scott
02-01-2008, 05:51 PM
I am certainly no expert, but you might consider a used fuelmaker product. They are specifically designed (safe) for the job intended. An unintended accident is bad for the whole cng community.

jetboatjohnny
02-01-2008, 06:35 PM
That sounds like good advice to me.
I remember Ron (where are you?) was talking about the same thing, I believe he is a CNG technician.
I'm sure is is quite possible to build a device, but at what expense?
Even if we got all our sharp and creative minds together to design a fueling device, could we do it for less than Fuelmaker?
I would be willing to put up my mechanicals design skills to help, that's what I do for a living.
On top of everything else, to do it legally, what kind of beauracratic red tape would you have to go thru?
J

MrComment
02-04-2008, 08:52 PM
Some general thoughts:

The idea of using a Scuba Compressor is not new; a lot of manufactures that offer NG Compressors also selling Scuba equipment as well, but you may have noticed that the NG equipment comes with Explosion proof motors, panels and pressure switches. Also they come with gas recovery equipment for the oil separator blow down cycles as well. The equipment also comes with built in diagnostics so that the compressor will shut down automatically when it malfunctions (not if it malfunctions).

Actually the oil separators on decent scuba equipment will also work for NG as well, but you definitely do not want Compressor oil in your NGV, or storage bottles.

You'll also need to evaluate your available flow rate from your utility meter. Bigger isn’t always possible. A typically house meters won’t flow more then 250,000 btu/hr at 0.25psig. You'll also need to subtract out of that flow rate your household gas loads (furnace + water heater + clothes dryer + stove/range + etc). Whatever is left over is all you’re going to be able to safely draw or you'll start starving your appliance's pilot lights for fuel, and worse yet, with a missing or defective check valve, each appliance may start "leaking" air in along with the gas into your compressor intake. (Obviously a potentially hazard).

Assumptions:
1 therm NG = 100,000 btu
1 therm NG = 100scf
1scfm = 0.01 therm/min

3scfm = 0.03 therm/min

0.03 therm/min * 60min = 1.8therms = 180,000 btu/hr

Assuming the 3scfm compressor is going to be drawing about 180,000 btu/hr at 3000 psig, but it will likely draw even more when the output pressure and compressor load is very low.

I assume the max flow at 200psig output is 4.9scfm (just guessing)
4.9scfm = 0.049 therm/min

0.049 therm/min * 60min = 2.94therms = 294,000 btu/hr

At this flow rate the compressor will start to draw a vacuum on the 250,000 btu/hr meter and all the pilots will starve for fuel in the house. In other words, this is very bad.

One solution to this problem is to have your utility come out and upgrade your meter to a larger flow rate and supply pressure. A typical upgrade could be a 800,000 btu/hr @ 2psig supply pressure, but you will still need to install regulator for the rest of your appliances in your house that run at 0.25psig, not a big deal, but the entire upgrade can typical cost about $1000.00. Also this potentially may cause your utility to also switch you to commercial billing which might cost you more per therm at the lower monthly usages for these billing tariffs. Not to mention they (the utility) are going to want you to explain your plan to their engineers who will also need a warm fuzzy.

Let’s not forget if you’re going to be running an electric motor, you'll like want it explosion proof, and likely single phase for residential use. This combination is going to make it harder to find motors much more then 3HP which for a 3scfm compressor you can actually just sneak by with, for about another (+$700-1k new). As for a gas engine on the other hand, this is going to create heat around your compressor which is going to make it harder to actually compress the gas into your storage tanks, and possibly the potential gain in compressor performance you hoped for might not actually materialize, also they are noisy and could cause your neighbors unwanted frustrations, especially if you’re filling up every day.

Explosion Proof 5000psig pressure switches ($350 ea); you'll need at least one.

You'll also still need a way to recapture the blow down gases from the oil separators. Some High Pressure plumbing and a large air compressor tank on the supply side. ($?)

Explosion proof enclosure and motor starter contacts ($?)

IMO using a scuba compressor would work, but its probably not going to end up being cheaper unless you can justify a real need for the additional capacity, and in those cases there are always used Fuelmaker or other Brand Compressors ready to go on the market, and if one Fuelmaker doesnt do the job for you, you could always get two.

If you bought a used Fuelmaker they seem to hold their value quite well. So a decent resale value is a real option if you want to upgrade or just sell your equipment someday.

Scuba compressors also hold their value, but what is the resale value of a jerry rigged scuba compressor once converted to breathe Natural Gas? (not so good I imagine)

Just my 2 cents, but I want to know how it turns out for you if you decide to go that way though, it sounds like it could be a fun project.

Be safe.

rkcarguy
06-27-2008, 03:55 PM
There's been little to nothing for used compressor's on the market is the problem. Whats out there is selling for way too much. I'm wondering if someone could utilize a old diesel engine as a compressor. Get one that died and just use a couple of the cylinders for your compressor............
I would think the internals of the diesel would handle the pressure given a compression test on one can be in excess of 500 PSI. I'd imagine that the actual forces the engine see's on an ignition cycle would be much higher and the rotating assembly would handle it.

CanAm
06-27-2008, 04:32 PM
What the market needs is a competitior to FM. There is nothing about a FMQ-2 that should make it cost $11k other than their monopoly. Maybe a knockoff from China? ;)

cnghal
06-28-2008, 11:23 AM
Danger! Danger! Will Robinson!!!!!
Please do not use the acronyms SCUBA and CNG in the same conversation on this forum! Short of a few stainless steel high pressure fittings these two technologies are totally different animals. Two different facets of the compressed gas industry.

First off, I am no fan of Fuelmaker and thier monopolistic policies and barely capable equipment that was deliberately engineered for the replacement parts market. Nor am I a fan of thier piss poor excuse of the difference between the Euro and the Dollar as a reason for nearly doubling the cost of some of thier parts. Or thier attitude and lack of attention to thier "Neighbor to the South" as they spool up thier international marketing efforts.

"What the market needs is a competitior to FM. There is nothing about a FMQ-2 that should make it cost $11k other than their monopoly. Maybe a knockoff from China?"

A knock off from China would certainly knock Fuelmaker off thier pedestal. So would any of the other offerings from Europe, The Netherlands and Australia.

Problem: None of them are capable of passing AGA, CGA, CSA, UL, NFPA safety standards. You remember, the standards that keep you, your family and your neighbor's family safe and from being subject to imported I.E.D.s.

That's an Improvised Explosive Device. Which is what you've all been talking about making. The engineering involved in building safe flammable materials handling equipment that can operate in a residential area is intense. The one and "only" justification that Fuelmaker can use in it's defence of high pricing.

Sure, an auto or diesel engine (basic air/gas pumps) could work. Hurricane used/uses a modified Ford 440ci engine for thier portables. They are high maintenance and don't last long. Kind of like when GM tryed making a diesel out of a small block 350. And people wunder why Americans don't like diesel engines.

Sure, air compressor companies could adapt thier products to gas compression. Just like Bauer or Ingersoll Rand did. They make nice little, affordable 25cfm compressors that work on a 5psi supply and a 20hp explosion-proof three phase motor. You just have to have a technician on staff to monitor it's operation and do a valve job every 500hrs.

"There's been little to nothing for used compressor's on the market is the problem. Whats out there is selling for way too much."

The problem is called supply and demand. Last year you could steal Fuelmakers and NGVs because nobody wanted them. "What's CNG?... Why would I pay $5,000 to convert my vehicle to a fuel it's hard to find...Why would I buy something like that when gas is only $2.65 a gallon?"
Good supply but no demand. Certainly no shortage of short sighted individuals.

A discussion of homebrewing your own CNG raises more questions (and dangers) than it answers and unless you have deep pockets, an engineering degree and a longing desire to bang your head againts a brick wall, I would suggest you leave the answers to those who do.:)

CanAm
06-28-2008, 12:54 PM
[COLOR=red]A [B]knock off from China would certainly knock Fuelmaker off thier pedestal. So would any of the other offerings from Europe, The Netherlands and Australia. The Chinese plants are more than capable of passing CSA, UL, etc. they do it all they time. I would like to find a solid design for a VFA and have it produced in China for a target of $1500 retail. Certainly doable. I do a lot of work with Chinese manufacturing of engineered products. You get what you ask for is the bottom line. If you don't ask for it you don't get it. FWIW their CNG tanks pass CSA, TC, DOT easily, and have an excellent safety record.
I would have to look at the FM design and patents and see what room we would have to produce a similar product.

TheBundo
06-28-2008, 02:04 PM
Please try to get a Chinese version made. I'll buy one

cnghal
06-28-2008, 02:59 PM
CanAm,
Pretty bold statements, which are you addressing, VRA design or manufacturing, because plants and manufacturing might pass an ISO standard, but it takes an actual presented design to pass CSA and UL. And several imported designs have tried. Where are they?:confused:

BTW, where are these Chinese CNG tanks that so easily pass CSA/ANSI NGV-2 2007 & DOT FMVSS 304 or CMVSS 301.2. I keep hearing claims and promises, but every time I ask for proof, the silence is deafening.
Just take a picture of one of these Unicorns and make a copy of thier pedigree the next time you see one.:rolleyes:

CanAm
06-28-2008, 03:05 PM
CanAm,
Pretty bold statements, which are you addressing, VRA design or manufacturing, because plants and manufacturing might pass an ISO standard, but it takes an actual presented design to pass CSA and UL. And several imported designs have tried. Where are they?:confused:

BTW, where are these Chinese CNG tanks that so easily pass CSA/ANSI NGV-2 2007 & DOT FMVSS 304 or CMVSS 301.2. I keep hearing claims and promises, but every time I ask for proof, the silence is deafening.
Just take a picture of one of these Unicorns and make a copy of thier pedigree the next time you see one.:rolleyes: I am not here to sell anything, so I don't know why the attack. But many of the Chinese/Argentine tank mfrs have NGV2 certs already in hand and 571.304 is not a tough challenge to any tank manufacturer.

ISO is hardly a standard these days. Most factories seems to gain ISO compliance now. It has very little to do with the actual product being turn out.

cnghal
06-28-2008, 03:29 PM
CanAm,
I beg to differ, you are selling the viability and intergity of, until actually proven otherwise, unsafe and potentially illegal equipment which violates the Terms of Service of this forum. There are no attacks intended here. I just ask that if you are going to vigorously claim a fact, that you substantiate it in truth with some form of evidence as to not confuse other forum users as to what is fact and what is opinion.
As to ISO, I mention it because it is the only standard that some of these imported products can stand on which doesn't amount to much when a toothpaste factory is ISO compliant and is also producing high pressure regulators.

CanAm
06-28-2008, 03:37 PM
CanAm,
I beg to differ, you are selling the viability and intergity of, until actually proven otherwise, unsafe and potentially illegal equipment which violates the Terms of Service of this forum. There are no attacks intended here. I just ask that if you are going to vigorously claim a fact, that you substantiate it in truth with some form of evidence as to not confuse other forum users as to what is fact and what is opinion.
As to ISO, I mention it because it is the only standard that some of these imported products can stand on which doesn't amount to much when a toothpaste factory is ISO compliant and is also producing high pressure regulators. Obviously, if an imported product is sold, and is marked with the approval marks, it would be up to the importer to ensure qualification, and up to the enforcement bodies to ensure compliance.

Adrian
06-28-2008, 04:18 PM
CanAm,
I beg to differ, you are selling the viability and intergity of, until actually proven otherwise, unsafe and potentially illegal equipment which violates the Terms of Service of this forum. There are no attacks intended here. I just ask that if you are going to vigorously claim a fact, that you substantiate it in truth with some form of evidence as to not confuse other forum users as to what is fact and what is opinion.
As to ISO, I mention it because it is the only standard that some of these imported products can stand on which doesn't amount to much when a toothpaste factory is ISO compliant and is also producing high pressure regulators.
Wow! that's a stretch of the terms of service.
Cnghal, I hope you know how to tolerate someone with an opinion different than yours. Otherwise I might be in trouble here because I believe we are allowed to have opinions on this website. If not, it's will become useless as a forum in time. Potentially illegal? It either is or isn't illegal. I could potentially grow wings and fly but haven't done so yet. The FAA might potentially want to ask me for a license in that situation. I might potentially fail that license...Anyway sounds like a stretch to me to attack someone for an OPINION. If a Chinese VRA was actually being sold by CanAm, I'd be interested too.

cnghal
06-28-2008, 07:18 PM
Adrian,
Glad to see you caught the edge to my posts. It might help you both to understand knowing that we have caught and banned a couple of people trying to sell non-certified Chinese tanks on this forum and on Ebay. The first person played like he was an interested member of the forum, then quickly started selling. The second was trying to sell non-certified tanks that he did not possess and were not even in this country.

So, I beg your pardons if I might seem a bit oppressive. I personnally see it as being vigilant to protect the unsuspecting members of this community from scam artists and unsafe and illegal products. A post I enjoy standing.

Opinions are always welcome on this forum, as long as we all follow the rules set forth. I was simply asking for clearification if it was an opinion or a fact with no evidence to support it. I'm still not sure.

BTW, as a longtime, full-time member of this industry (selling and servicing both legal conversions and filling equipment), I too beg for and work toward other more affordable options on a daily basis.

But neither I, nor the management of this forum are willing to compromise when it comes to your and our safety,the law and the reputation of this industry in which we make our living.:)

Franz
09-29-2008, 09:41 AM
This was tried back in the early 90's with no success. Several companies tried to import crossover use compressors from New Zealand, Australia, and China. The products were not intrinsically safe, did not meet any recognized safety organization of either country, used materials that more closely resembled air conditioning equipment, did not have any pressure limiting controls. Some of them did have scuba backgrounds.

Some of the high pressure line even had "BundyFlex" paper tags on the line. For those that do not know, BundyFlex is a highly recognized maker of brake lines. Brake lines are rated at twice max pressure, or around 2,000 psig. CNG fuel systems components are rated at a minimum of 4 times maximum pressure, or around 14,400 psig. Most of the industry uses Stainless Steel, which is rated at around 20,000, and still, people find ways to screw that up as well.

Early days of the CNG industry showed discarded and out of date Nitrogen and Oxygen cylinders with welding shop regulators.

Anyone wishing to try these "modifications" should max out their life insurance policy and verify that there is not a clause in it for performing acts that are in violation of any national safety codes or standards (believe it or not, but some insurance policies have such a clause), and just remember, that ducking and turning around is no protection against any failure. Shrapnel can travel in excess of the speed of sound and you cannot react fast enough to duck. We had a CNG tank failure that sent a piece of a CNG Aluminum cylinder through two sheetrock walls and imbedded itself in a cinderblock wall.

In another case, I was called in to investigate a CNG accident. A piece of 1/4" tubing that was not properly fitted cut a slice through a body panel of a 1992 Chevy Truck when it pulled through the compression fitting and whipped loose. Safety Glasses would not help there, sorry.

Franz

indyfilman
10-02-2008, 02:04 PM
Hey JetboatJohnny,
If you're still reading these posts, I'd like to invite you and anyone else with engineering expertise to join me and challenge the Fuelmaker monopoly.
I import many products from China, electric bicycle conversion kits being one of them, and I'm very confident that I could setup manufacturing relatively cheap IF I had a prototype that will rival (and improve) upon the design & safety features of Fuelmaker's home compressor units.
It is a CRYING SHAME that companies like them talk the talk, but thier real motivation is just to make as much cash as possible. They don't give a damn about getting North America off of foreign oil, or they would sell a good, 20 gge per day unit for under $3000. That is my goal, and by God, I am going to do it!
I'd appreciate any suggestions and/or help!

jetboatjohnny
10-02-2008, 02:15 PM
I'd like to help but I dont know anything about compressors. I do have the ability to do the documentation, drawings etc.

CraziFuzzy
10-03-2008, 04:03 AM
I'd like to help but I dont know anything about compressors. I do have the ability to do the documentation, drawings etc.

I might recommend looking at a hydraulic based system, as it might be cheaper and easier to implement the proper safety measures. Basically, all you need on the gas side is a couple check valves, a PSV and the piston. All controls and drive system are on the hydraulic side, and can be mounted in a different air space from the gas systems (avoiding a lot of the intrinsically safe measure requirements).

It could use mostly off-the-shelf hydraulic components, and it would also probably be a lot quieter.

Mshepcomm
10-05-2008, 06:37 PM
I currently have a Chemical (and Mechanical) Engineer researching to find a viable Home VRA (1+ gge/hr), that we will get certified for the US, from a manufacturer that currently makes VRA's for the CNG markets elsewhere in the world.

I had a few long discussions a while ago with frustrated FuelMaker dealer/installers, who have tried to convince FM that they need to increase their annual production of units. As I was told, FM would rather not expand their annual production; they are happy selling fewer, more expensive units.
(and have a long back-log of orders)

It is time to "rock their comfy little boat". We (the USA) have massive reserves of CNG, and if we had more than one company offering VRA's in the US, it is better for all of us, except maybe FM.

I am not promising anything at this time, and I am not looking for money, partners, or investors. I am not looking to sell anything to anyone at this time.

This endeavor might be a pipe dream, but a company that has a monopoly on any segment of a market, deserves to have some competition.

freedml
10-05-2008, 07:23 PM
Going in the 'front door' for consumer appliance approval (like Phill) is likely to be extremely expensive and time-consuming, as Fuelmaker found out.

I think we're going to have to go in the 'back door' with some kind of 'kit' which the consumer will assemble and install. Ecofueler seems to be on the right track with a hydraulic compressor (no electrical components) which can be mounted away from any ignition sources.

A quick search for hydraulic compressors yielded only a few industrial models for which the required inlet pressure is far higher than domestic gas service.

I have a lot of experience in instrumentation including approval of devices/enclosures for hazardous areas and would be happy to help in this effort.

cowboy
10-05-2008, 08:03 PM
you all have missed the biggie propane tank augaaaaaaaaaa not for cng first of all this this is a liquid tank that is how it gets its capasity cng gets it from high pressure not interchangable any compresser that has the 4 stages needed to reach 3600 from 7 inchs will pump cng[you can raise pressure 4 times in each stage but you must have explosion proof elt parts and vent popit valves back to the intake along with crankcase vent as blow by is gas I am all for building and converting our cowboy own stuff but realy if you dont know what you are doing please get someone that dose as most of the time you only get one mistake and wont get to try again

Lakewood90712
10-05-2008, 08:58 PM
(edit) most of the time you only get one mistake and wont get to try again

Explosions from experiments , natures way of thinning the gene pool! ;)

CraziFuzzy
10-06-2008, 03:53 PM
[QUOTE=Lakewood90712;17632]Explosions from experiments , natures way of thinning the gene pool! ;)

QUOTE]

hehe.. I'm only assuming this was a joke... CE has no interest in the personal vehicle market, and has made that abundantly clear. The only possible change I can forsee with the CE buyout, would mean even LESS direct dealings with private parties, and some sort of leasing program through the utility companies, which would make it much easier for them (as they seem to be quite lazy). IT would also add two more middlemen, and considerable extra cost to the units.

OutOfTheORDINARY
10-08-2008, 10:05 AM
Yeah, I agree. Clean Energy and T. Boone Pickens are not pushing private individuals to convert their vehicles to CNG nearly as hard as they are pushing for the conversion of large vehicle fleets and 18-wheelers. More so, they are pushing for the manufacture of new CNG 18-wheelers over converting the used trucks.

The pickens plan does not call for any relaxing of EPA or CARB regulations on converting vehicles. Now only about 5 different engines, 1 chevy and 4 ford, can be legally converted. And that's not all models w/ these engines. Clean Energy has tons of public CNG stations though. I don't understand. Maybe drawing attention to this makes it harder to lobby against the EPA and CARB stuff?

For the price that Clean Energy charges for CNG and how T. Boone justifiably states over and over again that he is in it ALSO for the Moola, makes me think that he isn't going to bring down the price on the Fuelmaker anytime soon.

As for subduing the discussion of converting compressors that were not origionally intended for natural gas, please, I have a few questions and comments:

Is it any wonder that in the U.S., we have 3 of the largest automobile manufactures in the world that are getting out smarted by the rest of the world? God certainly isn't a baby sitter? Is the government a baby sitter? Should the moderator be? It seems that this whole mess that we are in with the economic crisis and mortgages is because we all need to get smart. Banks should have been smarter than to give mortgages to people that obviosly couldn't afford them. Much more, people should have been smarter than get loans they couldn't pay off. The point I'm trying to get to is, we were getting smart here in this forum. Is the moderator liable for any injury that we may cause ourselves or laws that we may break?

The person that the Nobel Prize was named after is Alfred Nobel. He received the prize for nitroglycerin. Unfortunately he made a miserable mistake. His own brother was blown up! Sometimes technological progress comes with a price.

We should be smarter than to be unsafe and wreckless!!! It should be safe to put an "out of the ordinary" compressor in the country, outside, with several layers of sand bag walls between you and the compressor, some safety valves that switch off the gas, temperature sensors to watch the compression heat and switch it off. And anything else that will sensibly keep me safe.

Does anyone know of any issues that a CNG compressor will have with compressing Hydrogen? We're producing Hydrogen right now from a windturbine and I need a compressor that will work with both. Maybe a compressor to work with synthesis gas too. We've got a team of us w/ a self-educated cattleman and farmers. Don't tell me about engineers. Many of them are overrated. I've been around plenty. Self-educated, jack-of-all-trades, internet savvy scientists are underrated.

I'm looking very intently into figuring out a way to come up with a CNG compressor cheaper. This forum has been very helpful.

mikel
01-03-2010, 11:26 AM
There's been little to nothing for used compressor's on the market is the problem. Whats out there is selling for way too much. I'm wondering if someone could utilize a old diesel engine as a compressor. Get one that died and just use a couple of the cylinders for your compressor............
I would think the internals of the diesel would handle the pressure given a compression test on one can be in excess of 500 PSI. I'd imagine that the actual forces the engine see's on an ignition cycle would be much higher and the rotating assembly would handle it.

Compression ratio is too low?

Lakewood90712
01-03-2010, 01:46 PM
Closing this thread . it's been idle for over a year. If anyone has info some new technology , please start a new thread.